Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robot Sybil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 20:45, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Robot Sybil

Appears to be a televison or radio series starring John Cleese. Cannot find a series (or a character) by the name of "Robot Sybil" on Google, and searches of John Cleese on Wikipedia and IMDB make absolutely no mention of this series, or any role in a series fitting that description. I've done a similar search on Geoffrey Rush, also with a complete lack of results. IMDB has no results for "Robot Sybil", neither does TV.com. Therefore, we have some serious Wikipedia:Verifiability issues here -- Saberwyn - The Zoids Expansion Project 01:50, 12 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete non-notable at best. Only 5 Google hits, which would be hard to imagine for a TV show - could be a hoax, not sure. Johntex\^talk 03:03, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Four of which appear to be Googlebombs for sex sites. The fifth is about a pharmacy chain, and the reference to "robot Sybil" is a nickname for their labeling and dispersing machine. -- Saberwyn
• Delete per nom. May be related to Fawlty Towers, but delete. Madman 04:22, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Only related beacuse it involves John Cleese and a character from each shares the name of Sybil -- Saberwyn
• Delete must be nonsense. not even those 5 hits are related to it -- Astrokey44|talk 05:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above ComputerJoe 08:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• John Cleese? Sybil??....all sounds a bit Fawlty to me...... Delete Jcuk
• Delete, unverifiable. Anything involving John Cleese would be easily verified if true. If it happens to be true, it deserves an article simply by being connected to Cleese, but I doubt it's real. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:02, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as possible hoax and non-verifiable. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 15:17, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong ^Talk 14:44, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.