Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robert Obara
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 23:16, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Robert Obara
Article about an "actor"(or rather, a student) that provides no proof of notability, a google search on the name gives nothing relevant, IMDB gives one appearance in an episode of "creepy canada", a documentary. yandman 09:59, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Did I forget to mention that the article was created by an spa account called RObara? yandman 10:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- This AfD was vandalised by the author of the article. yandman 10:03, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
Please keep in mind not all of Robert's acting contributions have been to film or television - but rather other media forms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Robarakira (talk • contribs)
- Delete - violates WP:AUTO. MER-C 10:16, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable actor. Article violates WP:COI and WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not for self-promotion (or promotion of any kind). Nobody deserves an article until they are notable pursuant to the criteria clearly set out in WP:N. This guy doesn't meet them. Also block user for vandalism of AfD. --Charlene 10:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete - Non-notable. Sander123 10:53, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:BIO criteria, not significant in the film industry, WP:AUTO, WP:COI. His role on IMDB since to be a very minor role. --Terence Ong (C | R) 12:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fails WP:COI, evident vanity piece.SkierRMH 04:51, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Maybe he'll become a big star one day and frame this AfD, but for now nn. --Oakshade 05:40, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete: His actions are becomign more deltion worthy than the article itself. --Wizardman 16:59, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

