The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Spare discussion, but sufficient in the case of an article lacking WP:RS (and thus, failing WP:V), where policy demands deletion. Xoloz 14:03, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Nonnotable company, no independent sources, includes trivia such as the typeface used in the corporate logo. Disputed prod. NawlinWiki 16:06, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 16:08, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Delete. No sources means no assurance of notability. Nick Graves 16:38, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.