Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rigel VII

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of Star Trek planets: R-S#R. ···日本穣^{? · Talk to Nihonjoe} 22:01, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rigel VII

Rigel VII (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article makes no assertions of real-world notability and includes only plot summary (save for one piece of production trivia). The subject of the article appears in a single episode, mentioned in background chatter/set dressing in a couple of others. Had redirected page to List of Star Trek planets: R-S#R but FrankWilliams (talk · contribs) objects -- however, I don't accept being "mentioned" as equating to "deserving" to stay. I've brought it to AfD to either axe entirely or endorse redirect. I'd also support redirecting to the episode in which it does play a significant role ("The Cage (Star Trek)"). --EEMeltonIV 18:02, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

• Merge and Redirect to Rigel in fiction. It's already mentioned there. --Charlene 18:24, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Restore EEMeltonIV's redirect Better dealt with in kind with the rest of the Rigel system in-universe and the myriad other planets covered there. No strong case for note in article and fewer/weaker refs in Rigel VII than in the R-S article. MrZaius^talk 06:12, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.