Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rick Lyke

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rick Lyke

Rick Lyke (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

No evidence of passing WP:NOTE (not for the first time, I have to point out that a link to Myspace does not constitute evidence of notability). Judging from the author's username (User:Lyke2Drink) WP:AUTO may also apply. Walton monarchist89 17:16, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Concur with nom. --Scimitar | parley 17:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete – subject appears to be an industry hack (no offence meant); fails WP:BIO. — mholland 18:08, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete vanity page, non-notable blog...glug glug.--Tainter 18:35, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BIO. No assertion of notability. Too many sentence fragments. Caknuck 20:39, 22 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Passes the "Is it a Carbon-based Lifeform?" test, but that's about it. --Calton | Talk 00:06, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.