Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Muhammad (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. JERRY ^talk _contribs 00:53, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Muhammad

Richard Muhammad (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was speedily deleted before AND had an Afd discussion going at the time in which all votes cast were for "delete". Not enough significant changes by parties without a conflict of interest have occured to justified inclusion. Is not notable, and the article appears to be nothing more than a vanity project. DJBullfish (talk) 05:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

CommentThe article is most likely being primarily edited by either the subject itself or a personal assistant or friend *of* the subject. DJBullfish (talk) 05:26, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, fails WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk 07:21, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom and per previous deletion could probably be speedied; fails WP:BIO notability. Snocrates 23:12, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Greswik (talk) 20:24, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.