Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Lederer (II)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There seems to be consensus. --Coredesat 06:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Lederer (II)

Richard Lederer (II) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

A 16 year old film editor who is a non notable person that does not meet WP:BIO. -- moe.RON ^{Let's talk | done} 18:39, 5 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Article is also unverifiable. Tarret 18:54, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no WP:RS indicating any sort of notability per WP:BIO; only "work" appears to be short film that was screened one time at a local film festival (and doesn't even look like it won). --Kinu ^t/_c 19:10, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Kinu. Nishkid64 20:32, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Trebor 21:51, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Confusion over IMDB disambiguation roman numerals does not suggest strong research. --Dhartung | Talk 22:45, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete in vain. Danny Lilithborne 01:37, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Only claim to notability is a short film nominated (and not winning) at a regional film festival. Caknuck 05:55, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not good verifiable sources, remember that Wikipedia is not IMDB.-- danntm ^T _C 15:42, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Okay, that seems understandable... 71.117.233.197 20:06, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per the nominator, does not yet meet our guidelines. Yamaguchi先生 06:40, 9 November 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.