Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard Blenkey (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.   jj137 (talk) 20:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Richard Blenkey

Richard Blenkey (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Despite the previous nomination, this person is not notable. I can find two online references to him - this and this - both of which talk about him in the context of other events, his coverage is not really in relation to the crimes he has been convicted of. Likely violation of WP:NPOV and WP:BLP1E in addition. One Night In Hackney₃₀₃ 01:50, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

• Delete, nothing indicating broader significance of crime or criminal. --Dhartung | Talk 07:07, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 08:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: We neither track criminals nor advertise when they get out. Only crimes that serve as a "crime of the century" or a cause celebre qualify. Utgard Loki (talk) 14:34, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Weak Delete, couple more stories but none are about him on his own. If any evidence can be found that he's notable, I'd change but I don't see it. TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 18:48, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.