Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Richard A. Miller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus. Mailer Diablo 19:57, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Richard A. Miller

I nominate this page because I suspect this is an autobiography. There is only one main author who also edited a topic about Miller's field. This person may deserve an article though. What do you guys think? Tony Bruguier 04:47, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete notability not established. Speedy? CanadianCaesar Et tu, Brute? 04:48, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:PROFTEST. Not a speedy, as the guy claims to be "an esteemed researcher at the University of Michigan Medical School" --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 05:27, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless notability can be established. Metamagician3000 09:37, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Clean up, expand and keep. 305 cites looks pretty good to me. [1] Regards, Ben Aveling 10:55, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep. A heavily-directed Google [[2]] (there's apparently a Richard Miller involved with UMich who runs a vocal institute) comes up with 276 unique hits, and flipping through them reveals forum speakerships and paper authorships. He seems to pass the WP:BIO bar for academics. RGTraynor 16:01, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep but wikify and clean up so it doesn't read so much biographical spiel (i.e. "In his spare time he enjoys theater and photography"). Just once I'd love to see a bio that says "In his spare time he enjoys pornography and drinking fifths of Castillo rum."--Isotope23 17:07, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep needs clean up and expanding. Funky Monkey 00:53, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, also has 2 professional awards to indicate notability [3], and shouldn't be faulted for excessive modesty on his personal homepage. Monicasdude 18:52, 17 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.