Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rev Otis Elevator

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy redirect to The Hamsters. There's only 1 sentence in this article anyways... — Scientizzle 19:01, 27 August 2007 (UTC). — Scientizzle 19:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rev_Otis_Elevator

Rev_Otis_Elevator (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non-notable artist in a non-notable band. No independent reliable sources are referenced to assert notability. KennethStein 18:26, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: This is not a bad faith nomination. I truly believe this is a non-notable artist in a non-notable bands. They don't meet a single point of the 12 set forth in WP:MUSIC. If they do, and that reference can be verified. Feel free to add it and I'll publicly change my opinion. Additionally, the pages were created by the band's webmaster.KennethStein 18:35, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

• Keep - Bad faith nomination for a stub article for a band member of a band that is indisputably notable WebHamster —Preceding unsigned comment added by WebHamster (talk • contribs) 18:28, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy close, bad faith nomination by sockpuppet master out for revenge. Corvus cornix 18:47, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy keep, bad faith nomination, obviously passes WP:MUSIC. ugen64 18:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
• Question. Which one of the 12 criteria for notability in WP:MUSIC does this non-notable artist and band meet? KennethStein 18:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Try 4 and 5 for starters. They frequently get played on BBC radio playlists. The fact that last titbit isn't on the article is immaterial as what is on the article already meets WP:MUSIC. Do you intend nominating AFD on every article every person who votes delete on one of your articles? Indisputedly bad faith nomination WebHamster 18:57, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.