Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resume-oriented programming

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:52, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Resume-oriented programming

This article is about a new word that has yet to find wide circulation and thus isn't notable enough for inclusion RicDod 20:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom: neologism. (|-- UlTiMuS ( U • T • C | M • E ) 21:20, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as nonsense Spearhead 21:28, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Nonsense is not a speedy deletion criterion. Please do not abuse the speedy deletion criteria. Uncle G 23:52, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Sounds more like something for a geek version of Urban Dictionary. Shadow1 22:33, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment. The "geek version" of Urban Dictionary is the Jargon File, though it's not user-edited. ColourBurst 22:54, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The only mention that I can find of this concept is this, and that is more a critique of the over-use of Enterprise Java Beans than it is an explanation of resume-oriented programming. This concept has not gained any traction at all in the world at large outside of its coiners, as far as I can determine. Notability isn't the issue. This is, simply, original research. Delete. Uncle G 23:51, 14 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Real and annoying phenomenon, but kind of soap-boxy and unencyclopedic. --Xrblsnggt 01:25, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom Carax 03:03, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete, incoherent nonsense. Pavel Vozenilek 03:55, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.