Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Requel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 15:06, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Requel, Midquel, Interquel

Neologisms. User:Zoe|(talk) 03:26, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - especially when the first sentence says "Midquel is a neologism" --Cassavau 03:28, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. What a bunch of garbage. ---Charles 03:45, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete All as protologisms per WP:NOR and WP:NEO. First draft of article read, "Requel was a term coined by Marcos Cosme, a Fairleigh Dickinson University film student and screen writer"[1]. Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. --Satori Son 03:56, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as NFT neologisms. Daniel Case 04:15, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per above. NawlinWiki 14:51, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete all per all above, and make any necessary cleanup to articles such as prequel, sequel, etc. --Kinu ^t/_c 15:31, 18 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This article is badly written and makes no sense whatsoever, not to mention the factual inaccuracies. TDude695 18:41, 19 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.