Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Republican Socialism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Tikiwont (talk) 10:39, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Republican Socialism
The label "Republican Socialist" has been widely used, but the article provides no evidence to support the claim that it is a distinct ideology. A reading of James Connolly et al might provide some underpinning to support an article on the subject, but this disorganised stub contains so little material that it is not worth keeping even as a starting point. I suggest deletion without prejudice to recreation if someone wants to try writing a proper article on the subject. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 17:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. . --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs)
- Delete without prejudice per BHG. Mandsford (talk) 17:44, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete; no sources indicating distinct studying of the concept, rather than use of the phrase. Relata refero (talk) 18:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom. Guliolopez (talk) 19:20, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Keep and fix Consider sources such as [[1]]. The term is notable, the article needs work.Nick Connolly (talk) 20:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Maybe the fix-it fairy will transform the article during the night. Mandsford (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have no objection to someone writing a decent article on the subject, even a decent stub, so long as it is properly sourced and offers some evidence that the concept of "republican socialism" is as claimed an ideology rather than just a label used by several groups with varying degrees of similarity.
However, the current article is so awful that it's not worth keeping. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:31, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- I have no objection to someone writing a decent article on the subject, even a decent stub, so long as it is properly sourced and offers some evidence that the concept of "republican socialism" is as claimed an ideology rather than just a label used by several groups with varying degrees of similarity.
- Maybe the fix-it fairy will transform the article during the night. Mandsford (talk) 20:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete. For the Irish version we have much better articles at Irish Republican Socialist Party and Irish Republican Socialist Movement. The history of the term suggests greater importance in early socialism (prior to 1848, say), when nascent socialist movements found themselves opposed to bourgeois republican movements who wanted to get rid of the monarchies but not so much redistribute the wealth. Also, the term has US modern uses that are akin to corporate welfare. I think this is an unnecessary and potentially misleading article. --Dhartung | Talk 21:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
- Delete Needs more sources for notability reasons. --Sharkface217 03:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak delete, Could add more information, make it plausible!!--Dwilso (talk) 03:43, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
