Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rennie Harris Puremovement

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as copyright infringement. Sam Blacketer 22:27, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rennie Harris Puremovement

Rennie Harris Puremovement (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Vanity article that reads like an advert. Fails WP:N. Cap'n Walker 19:47, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Despite being successful, does not mean that it is encyclopedic. Tiddly-Tom 20:52, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Strong Keep: Article may need work, but he's a notable performance artist and educator. Plenty of WP:Seliable Sources are available from news sources. A quick Gsearch[1] turned up two pages of news hits including the LA Times. Toddstreat1 20:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as a verbatim copyvio. So tagged - I've not actually deleted-and-closed this just in case someone feels the urge to do a rewrite. — iridescent 21:48, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

• Comment: Good catch. Toddstreat1 22:17, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.