Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rendering water

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:53, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rendering water

Rendering water (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Wikipedia is not a software guidebook. Anonymous DissidentTalk 00:45, 23 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. --Haemo 00:49, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Although water, along with human hair, is among the most difficult things to recreate in CGI, this is not an encyclopedic discussion of that problem, but a very sketchy how-to guide. --Dhartung | Talk 00:54, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. JJL 02:23, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Oysterguitarist~Talk 03:39, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Pavel Vozenilek 05:01, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Transwiki to wikibooks. John Vandenberg 09:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 09:09, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, no transwiki. Water rendering may be a worthy topic, but describing it as a "long process" doesn't really cut it. Zetawoof(ζ) 10:35, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, Wikipedia articles are not instruction manuals. I'm not convinced that an article of this title even has the potential to be an encyclopedic non how-to article, regardless of how it's rewritten. Fourohfour 11:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - Per nom, WP:NOT#ALSONOT, and Fourohfour above. Cool Bluetalk to me 13:58, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
  • delete per nom. Could be interesting if there are published methodological techniques specific to rendering water, but without any citations or justification of why it is a significant problem separate from other rendering challenges, it's a no go. Debivort 18:31, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.