Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remaking barnsley
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:23, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Remaking barnsley
No content, no assertation of notability RedHillian 16:31, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Yep, no content, sources, location information and most of all no signs of notability. Felix 17:09, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Hardly any context or assertion of notability has been provided - therefore violates WP:NOTE. --Ali 18:24, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- i have added more information which i hope will be more notable mikyt90
- Delete very little content and notability not proved. Hut 8.5 19:45, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Unsourced, not notable, and crystalballism. DarkAudit 19:46, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- may aswell delete as i can't find any more information for inclusion without infringing copyright 20:54 10 may 2007 GMT
-
- Comment you can use the content, just paraphrase it rather than copying it directly. Hut 8.5 20:01, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
- thanks for the advice but there is still insufficient information available to make the page worthwhile
- Delete Per nom. Stoic atarian 06:20, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per nominator? Is there a criterion that fits the bill? Burntsauce 17:01, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- New links added to page mikyt90 10:33 (UTC) 12 may 2007
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
