Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Relusion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Kchase T 06:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Relusion

Relusion (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Neologism, used by one person in new book, 1 relevant ghit SkierRMH 09:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Yet Another Worthless Neologism (YAWN), nn neologism. MER-C 11:07, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator. James086^{Talk | Contribs} 11:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete' Neologism. TSO1D 23:17, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:YAWN (sounds like a good redirect!) Danny Lilithborne 00:26, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

KEEP - when theory of relativity came out we should have deleted it because it was only used by one person! come on, its an original word therefore keep it, why not? if u dont like it dont read the article, the bigger wiki is the better.

• • Comment Your logic is awesome. I'm guessing you are not related to Einstein, though. Danny Lilithborne 04:52, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

perhaps these are religious fanatics who want the word removed, because its just another term to describe their delusion of god

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.