Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Recaffination

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Dreadstar † 17:41, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Recaffination

Recaffination (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Potential hoax, Google seach turns up 7 results that aren't useful. Seems like WP:OR, and (thus) not referenced. WP:BOLLOCKS? Booglamay (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment: If anything, this article should be Recaffeination (see Decaffeination) - but (again) Google turns up no relevant results. Booglamay (talk) 17:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Delete Looks like a hoax or WP:OR to me. Olaf Davis | Talk 17:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Nonsense. Also, article creator is a confirmed vandal. TheProf - T / C 17:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: Author is now blocked (indef.). Booglamay (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Comment: there seems to be a patent (or similar) for this process here - but before I eat my hat, I'd still class this as trivial and not a third party source. Booglamay (talk) 17:36, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete almost certain hoax, at best OR. JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.