Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rebecca Perry

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Canley (talk) 09:56, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rebecca Perry

Rebecca Perry (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Satifys WP:MUSIC but has had 2 db-bio tags placed on it, rmed the tags and placed under afd for comment RT | Talk 12:26, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

I am not sure what I am doing but I intend to provide links to appropriate areas of interest. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AussieMusicMaid (talk • contribs) 12:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep. If meets WP:MUSIC then she is notable within the WP meaning of notability. Needs references though. Greenshed (talk) 13:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete No sources to show that she does in fact meet WP:MUSIC or any other standards of notability. Even if it stands, the informal tone and POV-ness is inappropriate for an encyclopedia article. DarkAudit (talk) 15:31, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep - this nomination contains too much cryptic language and acronyms to decipher: avoid cryptic language, and the only thing that's apparent from the nomination is that even the nominator thinks it probably qualifies (and this isn't the place for general "comment") Tarinth (talk) 21:43, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
    • Comment But where's the proof? Where's the reliable, verifiable, and independent coverage? There is nothing here that proves that any of this happened. I'm not convinced that WP:MUSIC is in fact met here. DarkAudit (talk) 23:36, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
  • Weak keep. I've done some clean-up on the article, but it could certainly do with some citations. The original nomination makes no sense: if she satisfies WP:MUSIC, then why nominate the article for deletion? Leaving that aside, I think there is a useful debate to be had about notability. It seems to me that she qualifies under criteria for musicians #10, having done music for highly notable TV shows. However, arguably only doing incidental music for these makes for a weak claim. She may also qualify under criteria for composers #4 for her runner-up position for an advertising award. Bondegezou (talk) 16:15, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.