Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rapist

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect per WP:SNOW. Daniel Case 14:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rapist

Rapist (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nothing but original research. A very poor quality article. A redirect to rape should be the answer, unless anyone can provide a sourced rewrite. h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 11:48, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

• Redirect per nom. Completely WP:OR, a bit WP:POV, and provides no WP:RS. --Evb-wiki 12:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect I agree completely with the comments above. Springnuts 12:14, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect as above. Inherently a fork, whether well written or badly written. Mowsbury 13:04, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect no brainer, per nom. Ohconfucius 13:35, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
• Snowball Redirect. This is pretty open and shut. TheLetterM 14:01, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.