Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabenclan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:V is non-negotiable, and no reliable published sources have been cited for this content. Sandstein 06:04, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rabenclan

Rabenclan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

delete - non-notable org, original research, possible promotion, fails WP:V Frater Xyzzy 23:33, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Keep Referenced so is not unverifiable. Any original research/promotion can be removed without deleting the whole article. Organisation is notable in my opinon for actively taking an anti-neonazi stance, pagan organisations are rarely politcal. Mallanox 03:17, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete without prejudice towards creating new article - the reference is still connected to the subject; so there are still no third-party sources regarding this organization. B.Wind 04:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Larry V (talk | contribs) 12:13, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete I don't know which article Mallanox is looking at. The article I can see is not verified by reliable sources and features only an external link to the organisation's website. There is no evidence or assertion of notability here whatsoever. The editors of this article have had more than a year to cite multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the [group] itself. With none forthcoming, there is no article to be had. The threshold for inclusion in Wikipedia is verifiability, not truth. -- IslaySolomon | talk 20:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
    • The source I am looking at is the second one which is independent. Mallanox 03:56, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. IslaySolomon said all there is to say. A Train take the 20:39, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete As per IslaySolomon ≈Krasniy(talk|contribs) 21:51, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per IslaySolomon. SkierRMH,07:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep - Wikipedia is about information! Update the article, give references and add information rather than delete it! For crying out loud. FK0071a 10:14, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Strong keep -- if sourced, clearly notable. -- Simon Cursitor 07:56, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.