Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R-mean

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 23:10, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] R-mean

R-mean (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non-notable musician. -- RHaworth 07:19, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete — Not much assertion of notability. It seems very POV at best - "addictive sound of his music?" "incredibly marketable looks?" –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 07:52, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - probably fails WP:MUSIC even when verified. MER-C 08:42, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Possibly speedy for vanity (if that's possible). Not use of weasel words (incredible and extremely). Spinach Dip 09:29, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete NN, fails [WP:Music]]. As far as I can tell... 6 relevant ghits for R-mean, and about the same for the rest of the members of the group; 0 for "broken water" (you don't want to know what other uses that phrase has ;)...SkierRMH 04:20, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom. Mike Dillon 22:37, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per spam, npov, advertisment, etc. --Wizardman 16:46, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.