Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quiroga

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; whole article kept and tagged for cleanup till someone can make sense of it. Johnleemk | Talk 11:38, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quiroga

nn name, but I think it'd be better to run this through AfD Sceptre ^(Talk) 15:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per norm. - Mailer Diablo 15:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Mailer Diablo. --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 16:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Disambiguate. I'm leery of deleting all of this information. A number of the Quirogas mentioned probably merit articles of their own: the knight, the archbishop, the governor, the mayor, at least; these stubs could be made from the information here. We probably should have an article about the Valley of Quiroga. Move that information to separate stubs, and turn this page into a disambiguation like Kennedy. Smerdis of Tlön 17:50, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Stifle 00:27, 16 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, at least the disambiguation info since that's just what every other surname disambiguation page at category:Surnames is for. There's nothing that would make one surname more important than another (and if it was, Quiroga is a popular name in Spain and South America), besides the fact that someone notable enough to have an article has it, and two of the people listed on the page already have articles of their own. - Bobet 15:18, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.