Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quinn (band)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was no consensus; keep. Johnleemk | Talk 15:07, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quinn (band)

I'm not so sure about this one, It only had one album by a minor record laber and they are weakly shown in allmusic, so it's not a nn-band speedy, but the myspace link don't help really and it still looks like it fails WP:MUSIC. Delete for now but I might change my vote later. --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 01:25, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. --Terence Ong 09:03, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I tried many permutations of the band name with phrases like "glasgow", "louise quinn", "luss", "inbetween worlds", etc. on Google, but none of them made an impact. For a band formed in an English-speaking nation in the Google Age, this is a bad sign when it comes to notability for inclusion in an encyclopedia. Johnleemk | Talk 11:45, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Found a fair few media references on google uk, including BBC Radio 4. Mushin^talk 17:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Despite the bad choice of band names (do you know how many "___ Quinn" bands there are?) the link provided by Mushin does show they satisfy at least two of the WP:MUSIC criteria. Turnstep 18:38, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Mushin and Turnstep CJ Marsicano 07:03, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.