Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quadradius

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete -- Y not? 18:46, 12 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quadradius

Quadradius (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Article was nominated for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#G7. It's a reasonably well developed (Start-class), though. Anyhow, I'm nominating the article as a matter of process, as I feel discussion is needed if there were speedy tags on the page. Evilclown93(talk) 14:34, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak Delete The reviews are semi-impressive, but I get only 828 ghits for quadradius - pretty pathetic for a supposedly popular game. Out. Brianyoumans 17:01, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak keep The article was made by the creators of the game, I think, because it was chock-full of personal biographical info, but that's been (somewhat) removed. The article is altogether not that informative or useful, I guess. But I like the game. --Rebent

*Weak Delete: Isn't notable enough and the article isn't terribly encyclopaedic; it's either this or stubbify. --TheSeer - New statement below. (TalkˑContribs) 10:34, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 16:44, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: To be more specific, the article is rather self-glorifying (almost like an ad, and it would be worse had large sections hadn't been torn out recently) and for a web based game it's ghit count is very low.
  • Comment. I'm unclear on the notability criteria for online games, but this one doesn't seem any more notable than most; having said that, searching 'quadradius' just gave me 15,600 Google hits, so I'm not sure where the 828 figure above came from. I don't know if that makes it notable enough for inclusion. Terraxos 23:52, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
There is no criteria yet, but because they're online games, I would expect it to have a fairly decent (err... large) amount of Google hits. --TheSeer (TalkˑContribs) 02:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.