Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Purple Haze (Beer)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Abita Brewing Company. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Purple Haze (Beer)

Purple Haze (Beer) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

It's a purple beer. That does not make it notable, and I do not feel the manufacturer qualifies it as notable by default. Prod removed without comment. FrozenPurpleCube 03:21, 13 April 2007 (UTC) Adding this other beer by the same company:

Andygator (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

as its notability is equally questionable. FrozenPurpleCube 03:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

• Delete...with only links to the brewery, it's more or less spam. --Mary quite contrary ^(hai?) 04:09, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: It is one sentence long, appears non-notable and there is absolutely no reason why this one sentence merits an entire page, could easily have been included on the brewery article. IvoShandor 12:39, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect at Abita Brewing Company. - Smerdis of Tlön 16:16, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Abita Brewing Company, merging any usable content. MastCell ^Talk 19:25, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per above. Goodnightmush^Talk 19:44, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, all beers are notable! Ok, maybe not, but a guy can dream, can't he?  :) Merge seems like a reasonable option. Xtifr _tälk 15:04, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.