Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Punk-skinhead
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 23:17, 29 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Punk-skinhead
There have never been any references, and the article merely duplicates content that appears in the skinhead and Oi! articles. Spylab 02:28, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Unreferenced, NN, OR and all that is written can be found on other articles. Spawn Man 05:21, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. It's really sad but those exist. Infact, they are a majority in the Neo-Nazi Skinhead movement. They take a guitar switch from Em to Bb chord on full disturtion, and they never hit them right by the way, and scream stupid curse-words. M.V.E.i. 21:17, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - It's not a matter of whether they exist or not; the issue is whether they deserve their own separate (unreferenced) Wikipedia article, which duplicates content from other Wikipedia articles.Spylab 21:42, 11 September 2007 (UTC)
- It needs an article. The fact that it needs to be re-written and referenced is another story. M.V.E.i. 12:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Wknight94 (talk) 00:51, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - article is unreferenced and as stated above, is a repeat of information in other articles relating to this counter-culture.--Chef Christopher Allen Tanner, CCC 02:49, 21 September 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - Another thing is that nobody actually uses the term punk-skinhead. They either just say skinhead, or perhaps Oi! skinhead.Spylab 19:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Keep There will always be overlaps -- and there will always be contrary opinions -- but this provides a valuable definition of a discernible subcultural branching. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.234.243.2 (talk) 14:05, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

