Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PubSub Concepts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete as the article reads like a self-promotional piece. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:45, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] PubSub Concepts

vanity piece

Vanity piece (or advertisement) Jim62sch 23:23, 26 January 2006 (UTC)

• Keep and Cleanup - website has alexa rank of 12,916 and the google search for [pubsub search] turned up about 1,340,000 hits. The article does read like an advertisement, though. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 06:06, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Alexa rank of 10000 or better required for notability. Stifle 09:21, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Did you check the google search? It's been covered by the Wall Street Journal [1], among other places, making it notable under WP:WEB. Also, my understanding of WP:GT is that due to the volatility and sampling errors inherent to alexa's ranking system, the alexa rank cutoffs are mere guidelines and not hard-and-fast rules. -- Thesquire (talk - contribs) 09:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
  • CommentA vast majority of the hits are for the publish/subscribe (pubsub) concept itself, not for the company. Jim62sch 23:24, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Advertisement. - Andre Engels 10:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.