Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prostitution of children

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Keep per insufficient reasons for deletion. Nishkid64 22:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Prostitution of children

Prostitution of children (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

I wish to have this article deleted for the following reason: It is completely in need of a cleanup, it needs a complete rewrite, as the form it is written in is completely unacceptable for Wikipedia.--Rasillon 20:04, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Completing malformed nomination Martinp23 20:11, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep, not sure that a subjective decision for a complete rewrite should result an AFD. It's been tagged so no need to delete, an encyclopaedic subject with plenty of sources. Budgiekiller 20:16, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - if an article needs a re-write, that's not a reason to delete. As Budgiekiller states, it is an encylopedic article, and there is no reason in policy to delete. Would suggest a speedy close (and am slighty confused as to why Rasillon nommed this after I explained the "rules" to him on MSN - meh) Martinp23 20:20, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Keep invalid rationale for deletion.--Jersey Devil 20:21, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, per above  ::mikmt 20:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy keep since the nomination states an invalid reason for deletion "It needs rewrite". So Fix It. Edison 20:52, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • keep per above, try to find help for rewrite instead of AfD nomination. Arnoutf 20:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. So the article's crap. No different from great swathes of Wikipedia... Dev920 (Have a nice day!) 21:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep but move to Child prostitution which currently redirects to the article. Otto4711 22:01, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.