Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Professional Revolutionary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Even if it's poorly-written, that's not a valid reason for deletion. —Wknight94 (talk) 12:55, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Professional Revolutionary

Professional Revolutionary (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Blatant self-promotion. Little to no content.

• Keep the linked article in Variety establishes notability. I see no reason to delete this. --Satori ^(talk) 19:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep notability supported by references (Metro Times, Variety). Han-Kwang (t) 21:59, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Have either of you tried reading this? I fail to see how it can be referenced when the bulk of it is empty Peacock. Best start with a clean slate.--THobern 15:19, 3 September 2007 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by THobern (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.