Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Preservation Ohio

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 02:14, 5 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Preservation Ohio

Preservation Ohio (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No coverage seen from reliable sources; also reads like an advertisement Nyttend 13:17, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Spam if I ever saw it--Phoenix 15 14:50, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - Even a current google news search brings up a secondary reliable source [1]. The National Trust has written about them [2] [3] as the Toledo Blade has [4]. --Oakshade 03:05, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dihydrogen Monoxide (H₂O) 03:59, 30 September 2007 (UTC)

• Week Keep - May need cleanup, but i do not think it reads like an advert, and per Oakshade. Tiptoety 04:28, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, tag for cleanup. It is a brochure-like article, but there are sources available. --Dhartung | Talk 09:03, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, may be a better article after cleanup. STORMTRACKER 94 Stormtracker94 12:18, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• KeepA notable organization. The article could use some cleanup and some citations, but how do you discribe an organization, serving the public good, without mentioning it's objectives and prosperities. If it' s really a charitable organization, it will always sound like an add.--Thw1309 13:25, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Very weak keep Per Tiptoety - It seems trivial though. Tiptopper 13:53, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
• Keep per above. The article does need some work - but that's not a reason to delete. ZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 16:47, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.