Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Political choice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 05:02, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Political choice

Political choice (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

In spite of a plausible sounding name, this page appears to be original research. The sole 'source' given is not a reliable source (the link does not work, I assume it is meant to be to 'consumerism' rather than 'consumerium'. It has been PRODded, but the PROD has been removed by the author. Anarchia 01:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Original research and essay. --Hirohisat ^Talk 01:46, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable, unrepairable original research. No amount of editing would make this an article suitable for the encyclopaedia - the topic just does not exist outside of this article. Banno 02:19, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'm going to have to say this is original research, based on the lack of citations as compared to the detail of the article. In addition, the style of writing, and the fact that the article defines the term in detail but does absolutely nothing to discuss the term itself, such as it's history or examples of it's usage lead me to believe it is an original innovation. Calgary 04:27, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Seems not notable and original research. Maybe if the research gets published in an appropriate format, it could be an article eventually. Spacefarer 14:25, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.