Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pokemon darkness rage
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedily deleted by admin Grutness (csd a1). Non-admin closure of orphaned AFD per WP:DPR. Serpent's Choice 07:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Pokemon darkness rage
Anyone with common sense can see this page needs to be deleted. Not notable at all, poorly written, etc. (Sorry if this is a bad reason, I haven't recommended an article for deletion before). Sincerely, Thrashmeister {U|T|C} 03:31, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Pure nonsense, speedy delete if possible. TJ Spyke 03:47, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I'm all for a speedy deletion assuming someone can pick out the proper criterion. No notability asserted, no context, nonsense... anything? -- Kicking222 04:05, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy delete. Nonsense, nonnotable, and Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. (He said it would be released in Jan. 2007.) 129.98.212.51 04:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's worth an A1 (no context). Appropriate tag added for speedy deletion. Tevildo 04:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Comment: The article does say that it's a "romhack" so technically context is provided. But it's still non-notable. Kimchi.sg 04:27, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete this is non-sense. TSO1D 05:07, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete it, whatever the hell it is. Herostratus 06:08, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Not sure what it is, but I'm going with WP:CRYSTAL here, since they say it'll be released in '07 - and it isn't yet '07. --Dennisthe2 06:25, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete A1 and so tagged Gzkn 06:28, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- And just like that (click), it's gone... Grutness...wha? 07:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

