Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Poesybeat Arts Initiative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  08:52, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Poesybeat Arts Initiative and Poesybeat

Poesybeat Arts Initiative seems to be trying to establish a neologism (see also Poesybeat which has a subset of the same content, so I have bundled them together) and notability for an organization. Alexa rank for the referenced website is nonexistant. A Google search seems to return mostly tailchasers or this org itself, not much notability evidence. I would like to be proven wrong by seeing some sources added to the article that verifiably establish notability. ++Lar: t/c 02:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. Willing to change my feeling if evidence presented (in the article, not here). ++Lar: t/c 02:21, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Fails WP:CORP. Monkeyman^(talk) 05:54, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete not notable. Newyorktimescrossword 09:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.