Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Podstreaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Bobet 11:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Podstreaming

Yet another podcasting protologism. Claims to have been in use for a year and a half, but still only 136 Google hits. --Haakon 21:45, 20 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks,  (aeropagitica)   (talk)  11:55, 25 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for now, unless secondary references are included that substantiate notability, then maybe, if you can find me, I'll change my vote. Addhoc 11:58, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Delete - Sounds like a fad but google hits are around only 300 plus most links are nonsense sites (on google search). The article may be crystal ball.Bakaman _Bakatalk 17:53, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, per nom (and article not long enough). Cedars 04:23, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep This article has inherently notability as describing a new technology. Why should the its length matter? Allon FambrizziAllon Fambrizzi

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.