Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Plotbunny

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. seresin ( ¡? ) 06:07, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Plotbunny

Plotbunny (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Fanfic community neologism, without any supporting cites to verifiable reliable sources: author admits as much on talk page. Fails to meet notability criteria. The Anome (talk) 00:19, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Comment: As a term, its use is not limited to fanfiction -- I've seen it used in general writing forums and heard published authors use it in conversation. I suspect, though, that not enough reliable sources can be found to make this pass WP:NEOLOGISM. I'll give it a try over the next couple days, though. —Quasirandom (talk) 00:39, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 02:52, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete: No references provided, seems made up. Dwilso 05:34, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete yes this is a real term. No it is not encyclopedic. JuJube (talk) 09:44, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

• Delete. No references are provided to verify that this neologism is notable. Possible OR. OlenWhitaker • ^{talk to me} or _don't • ♣ ♥ ♠ ♦ 18:35, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Really, the term belongs on Urban Dictionary, if anything. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:22, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
• Delete wikt:plot bunny already does the job, without the additional OR. – sgeureka ^t•c 08:42, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.