Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planetpaul

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. -- Longhair 16:30, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Planetpaul

"Imaginary planet", really just an artist's website; nonnotable as planet, no opinion as to artist. NawlinWiki 16:07, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• • Comment the artist himself may well be notable -- see the external reviews [1] on his website. I still think Planetpaul should be deleted. NawlinWiki 16:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I'd have speedied it. utcursch | talk 16:17, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete: artist doesn't seem to have an article, his imaginary planet certainly doesn't deserve one. Could probably be speedied with db-bio. Oh, wait, the user who created this article just created a Paul du toit article, which is just the second paragraph of this one. -David Schaich 16:20, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete per nom. WP:NN, WP:OR, WP:V, and arguably WP:VAIN apply. Scorpiondollprincess 16:25, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. This is pure fantasy, OR, VAIN, its NN and nothing is V. SynergeticMaggot 16:26, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.