Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pizazz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 18:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pizazz

Pizazz (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Non-notable music with unsourced article since June 2006. --CyclePat 23:57, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Asserts some form of notability but fails to back it up. Fails WP:BAND. --Daniel J. Leivick 01:05, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notbale web phenomenon.--Tainter 01:34, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 02:23, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The only release for their music is the Internet and they are mocked more often than not? I think this falls far too low from our notability criteria? User:Dimadick
• Delete. Inadequately referenced. WMMartin 15:22, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:BAND, no apparent third-party coverage. ShadowHalo 23:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.