Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Piero Scaruffi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 21:43, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Piero Scaruffi

Piero Scaruffi (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Negative points:

• Fails criteria of WP:Bio.
• Article is also badly written.
• Entirely unsourced.
• Contains original, unfootnoted research.
• Possibly self-promotion either by the person in question or by a fan.
• Very hard to find evidence of peer review.

Positive points:

• Subject of article possibly merits an article but only if further evidence can be found of notability.

TRM-G 23:02, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

• Keep after searching his name at Amazon.com - seems notable enough to stay here--Ioannes Pragensis 12:28, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, the guy is a writer of several books, has popular website, and is a noted intellectual. 96T 00:27, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. Books exist, seem to be read reasonably widely within context. Article does need cleanup, but this is not a reason for deletion. Am I just imagining it, or are there a lot of bad-faith nominations today ? WMMartin 18:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.