Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phosphagen (dietary supplement)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:39, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Phosphagen (dietary supplement)

Phosphagen (dietary supplement) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

"Advertisement masquerading as an article". The "article" does not establish notability other than being a brand of creatine. The information used to assert notability is unsourced, or is simply marketing that was used by the manufacturer itself about its own product. There is already two articles about creatine and creatine supplements. There isn't any need to have a separate article about one specific brand, and this article doesn't add or enhance the information already in the other creatine articles. Quartet 03:40, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Obvious soapbox. Pablothegreat85 04:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect — to Creatine. Philippe Beaudette 04:18, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and not even appropriate for a redirect. Why should one commercial supplier's brand have a redirect.DGG 06:47, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete without redirect. Spam-ish. Realkyhick 07:22, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.