Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philotic Web

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. —Kirill Lokshin 01:06, 19 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Philotic Web

Not sure about this. Was speedied but it isn't a CSD. It's pretty sketchy and there probably isn't a lot to say about the website. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 19:28, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

  • keep. Just because not alot has been said, doesn't mean there isn't anything to say. Give it a chance, let people write on it, and then try to delete it. And just because there isn't alot to say on an article doesn't mean it should be deleted. There are a myraid of articles that are short. Schrodingers catsup 19:38, 14 December 2005 (UTC)
  • I think I'll go with Schrodinger's catsup on this. Let's keep it. --Tony Sidaway|Talk 13:45, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

*This is a forum with some accompanying essays. But what did this website actually do? Delete, because this isn't a web directory. Pilatus 17:54, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Reformatted the page, removing the website links and adding relevent content. Please remove the the deletion notice. --drue 19:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Content added is significant to understanding of the Enderverse, and page has been altered to reflect meaningful content. -TheMadjai 19:23, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
    • Wikipedia is a tertiary source that faithfully reports what others have said about the website. It is not a directory that lists what the website says about itself. Besides there is still no indication that is conforms to WP:WEB 82.26.169.23 Pilatus 19:59, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
      • Go and review the page again. All external links have been removed. --drue 20:02, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
        • Brainfart of mine. Vote changed to keep because the subject has changed altogether. Pilatus 20:06, 16 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.