Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philosophy & logic

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 12:44, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Philosophy & logic

Philosophy & logic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Prod tag removed. Personal essay - fails WP:OR. We already have articles on both philosophy and logic. Folantin 18:28, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - another copy-and-paste of someone's homework to Wikipedia. Bad homework, at that. D minus. And "hazy congolerations" fails WP:BOLLOCKS. Moreschi Deletion! 18:57, 9 January 2007 (UTC)

Delete An article with this title should be written, but not at all like this. This is just origional research and is a complete embarassment to wikipedia.--Sefringle 03:44, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Keep and cleanup. Valid topic, some OR to correct but overall a very good start by a newbie. Andrewa 06:23, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete. This article is entirely unnecessary and reeks of original research. If people are looking for something on the intersection between philosophy and logic, they can go to logic, since logic is mostly a subset of philosophy. If this article is indeed based on the ideas of Rene Descartes, then any ideas (not made up by the author of the article) can go there. Please delete this and excise this original research from Wikipedia. --Jackhorkheimer 10:10, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as an essay. Logic is a branch of philosophy as noted in the article on logic. -- Whpq 16:54, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete per above, a weak essay that smacks of OR. Per Jackhorkheimer, merge any Cartesian principles to the Rene Descartes article. --Richard 00:26, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.