Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Philip Henry Lee

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect. W.marsh 21:14, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Philip Henry Lee

Philip Henry Lee (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Article makes no claim of notability, apart from being spouse of someone notable, and offspring of someone midly notable without Wikipedia entry. Searhc engine comes up with next to nothing too. These are the only tools I personally have for any AFD debates. --Dangherous 13:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC) Dangherous 13:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

  • I find that an unwise AfD tool criteria when researching historic figures that were alive long before google or yahoo existed. --Oakshade 22:04, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep The google test (or yahoo test as it may be) is pretty unreliable when it comes to 19th century rector's sons. There may be some information out there relating to the divorce, which sounds rather notable for the period. Dina 21:25, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Adelaide Neilson. T Rex | talk 23:19, 6 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Adelaide Neilson. As this articles stands, this person does not pass WP:BIO. Unless the article is expanded to explain notability beyond relationships, this should be redirected. -- moe.RON Let's talk | done 01:25, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom, unless notability is explained. Being spouse of somebody famous doesn't make one a deserving candidate for an article or redirect. utcursch | talk 13:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Sorry, but this article provides no reason for it to be kept.delete.nascarfan1 18:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.