Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Kinloch

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 05:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peter Kinloch

Peter Kinloch (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Mr. Kinloch climbs mountains for charity. Admirable, but no indication that he's been recognized for this by independent sources. NawlinWiki 16:21, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete, notability not established or verifiable. Realkyhick 16:25, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • As author of the article I can confirm that the source is accurate and is available to read on the OCD Action website. I will fully accept the article being removed if this is the final decision taken. However, I would like to politely request that you review the source first before making that final decision. Uhurupeak 17:56, 30 July 2007
    • Comment: Primary sources — that is, those which are controlled by the subject or those with a direct connection to him — are not acceptable by themselves. Coverage from reliable sources is also necessary. We can't just take your word for it. Realkyhick 17:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. I had my eye on this one when it was created a few days ago but held off, hoping it would get expanded/sourced. Not the case. Peter Kinloch is not the subject of any reliable, verifiable, independent secondary sources, nor does he meet any of the other criteria in WP:BIO. He does good work, but he doesn't belong (in article form) on Wikipedia. ~ Danelo 18:22, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete has twice been speedied (once by me) on no assertion of notability; article still has no assertion of notability. Carlossuarez46 21:43, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.