Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter David Hamilton

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete Sources amount to a local BBC piece on Terminal 1, an art space, and a directory listing. ~ trialsanderrors 07:19, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Peter David Hamilton

Peter David Hamilton (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Tagged for speedy deletion as A7 and G11, but not a clear-cut case. What do you think? Guy (Help!) 12:45, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Doesn't appear particularly notable, and there may also be a conflict of interest: there are alot of edits to the page by a "phamilton". --John24601 13:37, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • I'm not so concerned that the subject is involved, but it does make me want to keep a close eye on the NPOV --Kevin Murray 21:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: If it's kept, it needs to be added to the disambiguation at Peter Hamilton. Newyorkbrad 16:10, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak delete, so far no opinion can be formed as there are no references as to notability Alf photoman 16:19, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep & Improve The BBC article seems to be pretty compelling evidence that we have notability sufficient for WP standards. I think there should be more research here. --Kevin Murray 21:39, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Kevin Murray Jcuk 21:49, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete if WP lists every MA student that has a show in a library and a press release on the local bbc website then there could be thousands of entries - just check out the amount of artists registered on his link to the axis artist's database. This seems very minor notability? --MrCampbell 15:02, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.