Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peacocking

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 02:58, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Peacocking

Neologism. Ryan Delaney ^talk 00:34, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete--Peta 00:45, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Adambiswanger1 00:54, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Mystery Method, which survived AfD. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mystery Method. Not sufficiently notable for its own article. Accurizer 01:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Terence Ong 01:06, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete sub-term of Mystery Method. While the primary article may have been notable enough for wikipedia, the multitude of subpages are not. Kevin_b_er 01:17, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

*Keep NoPuzzleStranger 02:07, 8 June 2006 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.163.100.198 (talk • contribs) Striked out vote attributed to blocked sockpuppet account. Accurizer 02:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect Why not redirect? --Ephilei 02:28, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Mystery Method —Mets501^talk 03:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, non-notable. Inner Earth 08:35, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. -- GWO
• Merge into Mystery Method, keep all that stuff together in a single article. Now that I review Mystery Method for the third time, I wonder how I missed its AFD. -- ReyBrujo 15:11, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Mets501 Computerjoe's talk 16:18, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Delete. Neologism only in use in Mystery Method. — Arthur Rubin | (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete -999 23:40, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.