Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Walhus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:58, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Walhus

Person is non-notable. No articles link to the article. Searching for him on Google only results in his user pages on other sites and his homepage, not any articles about him or his work. Davidstrauss 00:34, 9 June 2006 (UTC)

• Delete vanity; weak attempt at notability. —EdGl 00:46, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Per Nom MBob 00:52, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete possible vanity, definite nn. Adambiswanger1 02:09, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --JChap 02:56, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Oh Good Lord, I know who this is, and yes, "vanity" is the word for it. How did this thing get overlooked since last August? --Calton | Talk 03:50, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, WP:VAIN, WP:BIO. --Terence Ong 04:40, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:BIO and looks like vanity Ydam 10:58, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pure vanity. Thetruthbelow 23:35, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn. —Khoikhoi 03:50, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn bio, vanity.--Dakota ~ 06:49, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.