Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Singer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 01:54, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Singer

Paul Singer (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

POV tone. Months-old request for cleanup and wikification not fulfilled. Questionable notability. 52 Pickup 12:59, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral although I did find this BBC article which appears to back up at least some of the points in the article. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 13:05, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Neutral I recommend either a merge into the Rudolph guilliani article (if his donation can be confirmed) or a delete. Words like vulture certainly need to be removed asap.WikipedianProlific^(Talk) 13:48, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Having checked "Paul Singer", Elliot on a search engine, I found him mentioned by Forbes here. That makes at least one non-trivial reliable sources, establishing some notability.--Kylohk 15:02, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Not hard to find reliable sources mentioning him. I've added several to the article. Clarityfiend 16:10, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep sufficient non-trivial sources. Possibly some POV issues to be dealt with by editing.DGG (talk) 21:25, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
• Keep, major Wall Street honcho, just not a publicity hound. --Dhartung | Talk 06:12, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.