Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Dazeley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 03:12, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Dazeley

Paul Dazeley (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be a non notable child athlete, no sources provided in 8 months Daniel J. Leivick 00:52, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete - Non - notable sports person - HarryHall86 01:49, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Keep, I think he is a notable sports person. I added some more references to the article. Callelinea 02:05, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

Comment Of the four added articles I would say that only the final two are independent sources (the first is from a shaving cream company that sponsors Dazeley). Of the independent sources neither actually focus on Pual Dazeley accept to say that he was beaten by Tom Bennett who doesn't have an article either. --Daniel J. Leivick 02:35, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

• delete not notable. Oysterguitarist 02:19, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete olympic athletes are notable, commonwealth games athletes are not. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 05:39, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete The immediately above point isn't relevant, as he has only competed in the Junior Commonwealth Games. Hawkestone 13:47, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
• Weak Delete If he did compete in the main Commonwealth games then would have supported keeping but as only the junior games and without coverage focused on him by independent sources it must be deleted. Davewild 17:30, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.