Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paul Bushnell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Xoloz 23:55, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Paul Bushnell

Paul Bushnell (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

makes no assertion of notability. Nssdfdsfds 22:03, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete article lacks useful content; no proof of notability +Hexagon1 ^(t) 09:28, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:14, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy delete per CSD A7. Sr13 (T|C) 00:36, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete this is two sentences and no references, it isn't really even a stub. If this is a notable subject it needs serious changes. Anynobody 02:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete pn Looks like prod or even CSD material to me. Seed 2.0 13:38, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete - Per all above.--Bryson^{{Talk}{Edits}} 17:12, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.